Open Letter to Portsmouth Economic Development Authority

Commissioners Aaron J. Kelley, Chair; Lisa Lucas-Burke, Vice Chair; Charles “Brad” Hunter, Treasurer; Robert P. Beaman; Dean A. Thomasson; and Junius L. Thompson
Portsmouth Economic Development Authority
200 High Street
Portsmouth, VA 23704

Dear Commissioners:

At your previous meeting in January, the secretary of the EDA introduced a last-minute addition to your agenda.  It was not only dropped into your laps without prior notice, but you did not even receive a written copy of what he asked you to approve.  Instead, he read the text from the screen of his Blackberry.  Had I sat in your place at the boardroom table, I would have been unwilling to accept that mode and timing of presentation. I consider it disrespectful to you and to the citizens you serve. Continue reading

Open Letter to VA House Transportation Committee

Honorable Members of the House of Delegates:

I write as a resident of the City of Portsmouth and the Hampton Roads region to ask you to defeat H. B. 1253, which could be before your committee as soon as this Tuesday, February 4. Its companion bill, S. B. 513, which passed the Senate last week and is nearly identical in its provisions, should undergo the same fate. My principal objections to these measures, which would establish a new regional transportation authority in my part of the commonwealth are:

Continue reading

It’s about the Money

Having been born in Southern California does not, in and of itself, make me a southerner, but it may have inclined me to embracing some of the wit and wisdom that emanates from my adopted region. Sayings like “what goes around, comes around”, which holds true even in in reverse, and contractions like “y’all”, efficiently clarifying the singular or plural nature of the second person pronoun, I assimilated long ago. Another very serviceable southern-ism that won me over is the axiom that when someone asserts “it’s not about the money, it’s the principle”, you can expect the issue indeed to be about the money.

Continue reading

The City Council Woodshed

[An Open Letter to the Mayor and City Council]

Since the purpose and some of the discussion relating to the closed meeting of council scheduled for [Monday, October 28, 2013] has already aired in the media, I propose that you proceed in open session. The public to whom the Mayor and all of the rest of you are accountable deserves to know the untold part of this particular story. As former City Manager Chandler used to say, “Even a sheet of paper has two sides to it.” I know that if I were Mayor, I would not be willing to let the disgruntled members of council quoted in the Saturday issue of the Virginian-Pilot take me into the back room, verbally abuse me, and then let them leave to spread lies about what took place behind closed doors. No, I would insist that they say whatever they have on their minds in view of the public and before the unblinking lens of the camera; otherwise, I would not participate.

Additionally, offended members of council, since your city manager was also party to the conversation with VDOT and ERC that is causing your current state of indigestion, I am wondering why you aren’t calling him on the carpet along with the Mayor. Mr. Rowe could just as easily and knowledgeably have brought you up to speed on the meeting in question. Unlike Mayor Wright, who serves at the pleasure of my fellow citizens and me, the City Manager is accountable to council.

Please let me know if you need additional information.

Yours truly,
Mark Geduldig-Yatrofsky

The Good Toll Bridge

Over the past few months, a number of stories in the local media have shone a spotlight on the Elizabeth River Crossings project and the contract with the commonwealth that many of us consider an outrage. Along with a growing number of other concerned citizens, I have contributed both effort and money to seeing that deal undone. I want to be clear, though, that tolls in and of themselves are not the issue for me. Rather, it is a matter of the opaque process that brought the ERC deal into being without giving the citizenry an opportunity to approve or reject the final provisions.

Unlike the convoluted public-private partnership legal agreement underpinning the Midtown-Downtown-Martin Luther King Freeway Extension project, the South Norfolk Jordan Bridge endeavor was a rather straightforward private undertaking. The FIGG company, using private money, demolished the derelict Jordan Bridge that had become inoperable and built a new structure across the Elizabeth River between Chesapeake and Portsmouth. Accommodating not only motor vehicles but also bicycle and pedestrian traffic, the dazzlingly beautiful South Norfolk Jordan Bridge reconnected the community of South Norfolk to the Norfolk Naval Shipyard and the Cradock community in a minimal amount of time and without the massive cost overruns that are the bane of many transportation projects.

For motorists, crossing the SNJB comes at a price. After all, the people financing the bridge construction are not doing so as a philanthropic gesture nor receiving large government subsidies for their efforts. Even so, the $2-$3-$4 initial rate for passenger vehicles, depending on mode of payment, was not unreasonable based on current prices for labor, materials, and associated costs. Yet, when the Gilmerton Bridge closed for a time last winter to accommodate its renovation, in the spirit of neighborliness, the SNJB operators reduced their charges temporarily instead of exploiting those displaced from their normal route by increasing the toll rate.

From April 1 until June 18, I made the SNJB a regular part of my commute. Traveling from the Churchland section of Portsmouth to the Lynnhaven area of Virginia Beach and back each workday, I crossed that bridge 84 times. I typically used it during prime morning and evening drive times but encountered a back up only on one midweek afternoon and only for about ten minutes. As an E-ZPass holder, I paid the lowest rate of $1 (now risen to a $1.50). In terms of time and wear-and-tear on my nerves saved, I think I got a great deal. I detest sitting in traffic as much as anyone, and I resent the people who think they are too important to take their turn waiting in line. All in all, I think the SNJB is a great asset to the region, and I plan to continue to use it regularly.

Litmus Test: Is It a Question of Process or Something Else?

The PilotOnline article about Council Member Meeks’s robocalls has attracted a lot of commentary. It has piqued my curiousity, as well, about how different segments of our community see this issue. To allow for a more in depth discussion, I’m reposting my original question here.

The premise is: a European American majority council contemplates making “permanent” the interim appointments of an African American city manager and attorney with identical experience and qualifications to those of Messrs. Rowe and Willson. A “supermajority” of the council members have agreed in closed session to offer the jobs to the incumbents, but the final public vote lies ahead. A few days beforehand, a prominent tea party-affiliated constituent urges council to open up the process and broaden the search. Do you see a difference between the actual and the hypothetical scenarios? Please explain your answer. (I will defer sharing my own opinion until later.)

My Moral Dilemma

Conservative talk-show host Laura Schlessinger, better known as “Dr. Laura”, liked to ask callers about their “moral dilemmas”. In filling the gap left when our council decided to stop recording and airing presentations of non-agenda speakers at regular meetings, I have encountered one of my own. Over my nearly fifteen years of observing council proceedings here in Portsmouth, I have found that city council members are not loathe to decry grandstanding by citizens, but they are most tolerant of their own attention-seeking behaviors. In fact, the structure of their semimonthly meetings maximizes their opportunities to appear in the limelight. Opening presentations and proclamations, board and commission member anointment, and “Items Submitted by Council Members” all provide “solo performance” opportunities to our elected body. Beyond that, every agenda item provides them the opportunity to opine for as long as they wish, or their colleagues will endure, on the matter at hand.
Continue reading

(Il)logical Conclusions

(I endeavor to keep the focus of this site on Portsmouth issues, but I have been working against one very ill-considered provision of the comprehensive transportation funding bill, the hybrid registration surcharge. I know I’m not the only gas/electric fuel automobile owner in Portsmouth, so this issue must have some resonance for at least a few others.)

How about this innovative idea: Since the hybrid surcharge rationale is really based on what the Commonwealth needs to raise in revenue, not actual individual resource use, why not apply the same logic to other taxes. If we need more sales tax revenue, let’s slap an under-consumption fee on those slackers who aren’t buying enough consumer goods to satisfy state revenue needs. How about those low-wage, unemployed, permanently disabled, and retired folks scraping by on meager resources? They’re not contributing their fair share of income taxes, are they? Let’s hit them with an underachiever’s fee. This has so much potential, we should just expand it across the spectrum of fees, taxes, and tolls so we soak up every available dime of discretionary income from everybody. My one misgiving about suggesting this, though, is if a member of the General Assembly runs across it, s/he may not understand this is intended as irony and promote the idea. As we’ve seen on numerous occasions, in Virginia no notions are too crazy to find a patron in our state legislature. (State currency, anyone?)

Non-Agenda Address to City Council

(The following is a transcription of a non-agenda presentation from retired Portsmouth Fire Captain Robert Turner to City Council and the public at the regular council meeting of January 22, 2013. It appears here with some stylistic and clarifying edits.)

City Manager, City Council, Mayor:

My name is Robert Turner (most of you know me). I’m the President of the Portsmouth Fire and Police Retirement Association, and I have brought three different situations to your attention in the past. [I have met] with Mayor Wright two times and the City Manager once [as well as one conversation] on the phone. Yet, I have not had the first phone call or seen any of the subjects brought up at work sessions or [in] the council meetings. I did get one remark from Councilman Moody suggesting you look again at the discrimination . . . towards approximately seventy retirees (although several have died while waiting for action. . . .) Mayor Wright’s reply is what can we do to fix it at the least cost — where can we compromise. Fix what’s wrong. We constantly hear there is no money, yet we keep seeing you finding some for different projects.

  1. [Those who] retired prior to 1993 were, and still are, paying a premium for their death benefit. Yet those who retired since then, with two to three times the amount of retirement [benefits had] their premium bought out by the city. . . . If that is not discrimination, what is? One person tells me that amounts to fraud!
  2. Those retirees who were working in 1978 were given a booklet for planning and figuring their retirement [which] stated there would be cost of living raises yearly. [In practice], ours doesn’t come close even to Social Security. We don’t pay half taxes and fees, [so] why is our cost of living [adjustment] cut in half compared to [that of] others?
  3. Our retirement system has lost over forty per cent [of its value] in the past seven year even with larger contributions by the city. I recently witnessed one retiree get 120% of his base salary while . . . another received 96.2%. Because of the city or, maybe, Chief Horton failing to replace retirees and giving overtime to small groups of people, [one particular individual received unusually] high compensation and retirement benefits [of] $76,000 for the rest of his life. . . .
  4. I think the city should be looking into the [previous] city manager – Chief Horton situation for wrongful acts. Horton was a buddy . . . brought here by [that] manager and [may not have qualified] to be Chief [under] our published requirements for that position!

I know this is a lot to swallow for our two new council members, but the rest should be aware of everything I have mentioned. I would love to hear some feedback from this. Also, I would be more than glad to discuss this at a work session where there are no gag orders, if I [were] invited!

Thank you for [your] time and, I hope, your consideration concerning this matters.

Practice Makes Perfect?

Thanks to Portsmouth Taxpayer Alliance President Pat Simons for this bit of information: the City Council Public Work Session on January 22, 2013, did not get recorded. The non-agenda speakers recording exclusion policy does not apply in this instance since at work sessions the public is visible from time to time but never heard. When Ms. Simons inquired as to what became of the recording in question, she learned that someone had failed to inform the contract videographer that the city would need his services for that time slot. Back when Tyrell Ducre was our in-house A/V production department, that would not have happened. I suppose, though, when you have a policy in place of blacking out some portions of public meetings willy-nilly, it might well confuse the hired help.